Sameness and Difference in the Historical Development of Art. Gilles Deleuze and Arthur Danto´s Approaches

Authors

  • Juan P. Sosa Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
  • Mariano O. Martínez Atencio Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/25457888e016

Keywords:

Philosohpy of art, Aesthetics, History, Danto, Deleuze

Abstract

The history of art is marked by a series of alterations and transformationsthat shape its physiognomy. For some approaches, the historical impulse ofart accompanied the search for difference as a constitutive element. Thus,from the theoretical proposal of Arthur Danto, the history of art would havereached its completion once that such experimentation threw its specificdefinition from the philosophy occupied in its analysis; whereas for GillesDeleuze’s approach the history of art is only the set of conditions from whichit is necessary to flee for the creation of the new, that is, the different. Thepresent essay seeks to articulate two dissimilar readings under a commonproblem: the concept of difference as constitutive of art.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bacharach, S. (2002). Can art really end? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60(1), 57-66.

Carrier, D. (1998). After the end of art and art history. History and Theory, 37(4), 1-16.

Carroll, N. (1998). The end of art? History and Theory, 37(4), 17-29.

Danto, A. (1964). The Artworld. The Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571-584.

Danto, A. [1981] (2004). La Transfiguración del Lugar Común. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.

Danto, A. (1998). The End of art: A Philosophical Defense. History and Theory, 37(4), 127-143.

Deleuze, G. (1970). Proust y los signos (Trad. Francisco Monge). Barcelona, España: Anagrama.

Deleuze, G. (2008a). Lógica del sentido (Trad. Miguel Morey y Victor Molina). Barcelona, España: Paidós.

Deleuze, G. (2008b). Nietzsche y la filosofía (Trad. Carmen Artal). Barcelona, España: Anagrama.

Deleuze, G. (2009a). Diferencia y repetición (Trad. María Silvia Delpy y Hugo Beccacece). Barcelona, España: Amorrortu.

Deleuze, G. (2009b). Francis Bacon. Lógica de la sensación, Madrid, España: Arena Libros.

Deleuze, G. (2013). Diálogos (Trad. José Vázquez Pérez). Valencia, España: Pre-Textos.

Deleuze, G. (2014). Conversaciones. 1972-1990. (Trad. José Luis Pardo). Valencia, España: Pre-Textos.

Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (2006). Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. (Trad. José Vázquez Pérez y Umbelena Larraceleta). Valencia, España: Pre-Textos.

Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (2009). ¿Qué es la filosofía? (Trad. Thomas Kauf). Barcelona, España: Anagrama.

Kennick, W. (1958). Does Traditional Aesthetics Rest on a Mistake? Mind, (67), 317-34.

Scherér, R. (2012). Miradas sobre Deleuze (Trad. Sebastián Puente). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Cactus.

Vilar, G. (2005). Las razones del arte. Madrid, España: Visor.

Warhol, A. (1964). Brillo Box [Objeto]. Recuperado de https://www.moma.org/collection/works/81384

Weitz, M. (1956). The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 27-37.

Wittgenstein, L. [1953] (2008). Investigaciones filosóficas. Barcelona, España: Crítica.

Ziff, P. (1953). The Task of Defining a Work of Art. The Philosophical Review, (62), 58-78.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

How to Cite

Sosa, J. P., & Martínez Atencio, M. O. (2019). Sameness and Difference in the Historical Development of Art. Gilles Deleuze and Arthur Danto´s Approaches. Armiliar, (3), e016. https://doi.org/10.24215/25457888e016

Issue

No. 3 (2019): Armiliar 3

Section

Articles

License


Current policy since 2019

The acceptance of the manuscript by the magazine means the non-exclusive cession of the property rights of the authors in favour of the editor, who allows the reuse, after publication (post print), under a license Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlikes 4.0 International (BY-NC-SA 4.0).

According to these terms, the material can be copied and redistributed by any means or in any format as long as a) the author and original source of the publication are quoted (magazine and URL of the work), access to the license is provided and whether changes have been made is mentioned; and b) the material is not used for commercial purposes.

The cession of non-exclusive rights means that after the publication (post print) in Armiliar the authors can publish their work in any language, means and format; in such cases it must be mentioned that the material was originally published in this magazine. Such cession also means the authorization of the authors for the work to be collected by SEDICI, the institutional archive of the Universidad Nacional de La Plata, and to be spread in the databases that the editorial team considers appropriate to increase the visibility of the publication and its authors.

Moreover, the magazine encourages the authors to deposit their productions in other institutional and thematic archives under the principle that offering the society the scientific and academic production without any restrictions contributes to a greater exchange of the global knowledge.